Even Indian Law Institute published a volume but that work is doubtful on the legal research presence in law as such.
Today we find several conflicting opinions, lie Law department advices the other ministries that law courts should not step in eminent domain, like Veerappa Moily recently gave a clean chit to Telecom ministry to ignore the Regulator though that ministry deliberately permitted several thousands crores losses to exchequer as the telecom minstry choose to help the earlier bidders in telecom in G2 spectrum.
So the state is fluid to accept all corruptions at the cost of tax payers of all sorts.. direct or indirect tax payers not only in India, but world over!
Is it not high time that legal coommunity should be accountable?
Friday, September 24, 2010
Thursday, September 23, 2010
In the conference how they will tackle is a 100 bn $ question. After all people are day by day lose confidence in law courts and they desist to come to courts as they are not confident whether courts are for them or for arbitrary legislators!
Before things go out of hand, is it not the duty of Law authorities, academics, jurists world over to ponder over to rectify?
Some say legal research, is there any legal researches commissioned by governments any where inthe world as is done in social research methods. Even today, we giver LL.D, or PhD degrees in law with really no sensible research!
Before things go out of hand, is it not the duty of Law authorities, academics, jurists world over to ponder over to rectify?
Some say legal research, is there any legal researches commissioned by governments any where inthe world as is done in social research methods. Even today, we giver LL.D, or PhD degrees in law with really no sensible research!
contd..
President Woodrow Wilson said, 'I do not see any one can possibly understand the law or know anything of it, except ;Memoriter' without getting a clear idea of how it iis in fact generated in society from age to age to its immediate needs and use'..indeed a thought to be pondered over by all eminent jurists, universities of law or schools of Law!
contg.
Braden member of Connecticut Bar in 1952 said in his article 'Legal Research : A variation of an old Lament' published in Journal of Legal Education 39-45(1952-53).
Clearly specified ' Legal Scholars write and write in the Law journals and publish and publish and what we do have.'...a lot of chaff with no grains!
Braden member of Connecticut Bar in 1952 said in his article 'Legal Research : A variation of an old Lament' published in Journal of Legal Education 39-45(1952-53).
Clearly specified ' Legal Scholars write and write in the Law journals and publish and publish and what we do have.'...a lot of chaff with no grains!
Legal & Judicial [profession - High quality paper likely to be tackled in CWLC - Commonwealth Law conference in 2011 in February to be held at Hyderabad, india!
This is a 17th conference after a gap of 40 years. May attract legal minds all over from commonwealth.
Yes hosted by Commonwealth Lawyers association.
Time has come for soul searching. Whether Law is at all research based perspectives? Now so far the answer is clear No. It is a profession made of unrealistic laws as these laws are created by Legislators, as Laymen and Courts under great eminent domain accepts the so called statutes not standing on four legs but dangling on one leg like an acrobat.
Yes hosted by Commonwealth Lawyers association.
Time has come for soul searching. Whether Law is at all research based perspectives? Now so far the answer is clear No. It is a profession made of unrealistic laws as these laws are created by Legislators, as Laymen and Courts under great eminent domain accepts the so called statutes not standing on four legs but dangling on one leg like an acrobat.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
leave RBI to really function as regulator pls!
regulator like RBI should not be managed by union cabinet - say finance ministry, as cabinet does not have as much expertise like RBI!
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
economy uncertain
uncertainties are very heavily dangling all people, as bankers and corporate houses so too governments play too much with economies' tax payers moneys with so called derivatives and hedges, u know the fate!
life & economics!
life is great if it do not give too much credence to destructible money!
live a life assacredly as you can then there is bliss and that is enlightenment
live a life assacredly as you can then there is bliss and that is enlightenment
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
JOHN MACKEY ; 'I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT MAXIMIZING PROFITS FOR INVESTORS IS THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL CORPORATE ACTIONS. THE INVESTORS ARE NOT ONLY PEOPLE WHO MATTER . CORPORATIONS CAN EXIST FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN SIMPLY MAXIMIZING PROFITS.'
IT IS A GREAT STATEMENT EVERY CORPORATE HAS TO UNDERSTAND, TO WORK COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE WITH CUSTOMERS!
Friday, July 16, 2010
Maharashtra education policy!
is it not funny! because one tend to think what will happen to students future education if Maharashtra follows a policy of education which is not compatible to all india so too chances of students admission elsewhere in the world as the educationists all over the world examine every year of course study!
Ashok Chavan!
He wants union territory status in Belgaum and adjoining districts covering 800 and odd villages. Does it mean he will allow Mumbai to become Union territory then his demand on Belgaum + appears balanced!
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Ashok Chavan CM Maharashtra on Belgaum!
He says Karnataka is imposing Kannnada language on Maharashtrians while he imposes Marati on non Marati speaking people in Maharashtra, to promote Marati language, where is balance of administration at all.
Yeddiyurappa a CM of Karnataka!
Heis an interesting person. Today i saw him talking to several news channels. He says he had a cordial meeting with Bharadwaj, Governor of Karnataka.
He says CBI inquiry on Reddy Bros not needed now as Lok Ayukta Hegde J (Retd SCourt), while he clipped his powers of investigating on Ministers and Top bureaucrats!
Why he is jittery of Governor, Probably, Governor might invoke Art 356 for governor's rule, say President's rule in Karnataka.
He again tells he requested Governor to see Assembly functions by asking opposition to join discussions in Assembly!
After all it is the function of Treasury benches to convince opposition they be fair to opposition!
Why this dance ?
He says CBI inquiry on Reddy Bros not needed now as Lok Ayukta Hegde J (Retd SCourt), while he clipped his powers of investigating on Ministers and Top bureaucrats!
Why he is jittery of Governor, Probably, Governor might invoke Art 356 for governor's rule, say President's rule in Karnataka.
He again tells he requested Governor to see Assembly functions by asking opposition to join discussions in Assembly!
After all it is the function of Treasury benches to convince opposition they be fair to opposition!
Why this dance ?
Friday, June 18, 2010
EU is on 2 to 4% inflation-recession cycles!
inflation is a solution to Europe, 'might sound heresy but doubling the developed world's inflation target to 4% could be a viable alternate option to both reduce the 'debt' burden and boost growth' is a view
Friday, May 21, 2010
Saturday, February 6, 2010
An advice for clients against arbitrary governments
RUDDRAIAH?SC MATTER:
MAIN POINTS DRAFT;
1. R PURCHASED SITES, 25 AND 26 AT BANGALORE FROM SMT LAKSHMAMMA IN 1997.
2. THIS LADY FILED A CIVIL CASE OS.3046/1977?.IN THE FIRST MUNSIFF CIVIL COURT AT BANGALORE FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST BANGALORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AS BMC WANTED ATTEMPTED TO FORM A ROAD AND OPEN SEWERAGE DRAIN ON PROPERTY AT SITE NOS.25 AND 26 WHICH PROPERTY IS OWNED BY HER AS ABSOLUTE OWNER.
3. THE MUNSIFF COURT DISMISSED HER SUIT OS3046/1977 ON 25.6.1979.
4. AGGRIEVED, SHE MOVES APPEAL UNDER RA/599/1980 BEFORE CITY CIVIL JUDGE BANGALORE. COURT ALLOWS HER APPEAL AND PASSED DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON 9.12.1982.
5. INJUNCTION AGAINST BMC IS IN THE FORM OF A DECREE FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
6. RUDRAIAH, THE NEW OWNER OF HER ABSOLUTE OWNERSHIP PROPERTIES AT SITES 25 AND 26, SINCE PURCHASED UNDER A SALE DEED DULY REGISTERED ON 29.1.1993, ON THE BASIS THAT SHE OBTAINED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST ?BMC?, IN HER RA/599/1980 AND GRANTED INJUNCTION ON 9.12.1982.
7. RUDDRAIAH AS SUCCESSOR TO THE PROPERTY HAS TO MOVE EXECUTION OF DECREE, IN 1997 AGAINST ?BMC? AS IT AGAIN OBSTRUCTED HIM FROM MOVING HIS BUILDING MATERIALS TO THE SITES 25 AND 26 BY ITS OFFICERS AND WORKERS.
8. RUDDRAIAH MOVES EXECUTION PETITION NO.1019/1997 AGAINST IN THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE COURT ON 20.9.1997, WITH DUE AFFIDAVITS TO PROTECT HIS PROPERTY AS NEW OWNER SINCE 29.1.1993.
9. THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE TREATS ?BMC? AS ?JuD?, ENFORCES THE DECREE.
10. BMC MOVES APPLICATION U/S.151 OF CPC, RAISING ALL FRIVOLOUS REASONS, and asking the court to prepone THE CASE 5.11.1998 TO 23.10.98, BY FILING AN AFFIDAVIT DATED 16.10.1998 FOR ?EQUITY? UNDER ITS OBJECTIONS:
1. EXE. PETTITION OF RUDDRAIAH 10/19/1997 AS NOT MAINTAINABLE,
2. EXECUTOR AS THE THIRD PERSON,
3. LAKSHMAMMA, ORIGINAL DECREE HOLDER DID NOT RAISE OBJECTION TO JuD (BMC) FOR LAST 20 YEARS..,
4. RUDDRAIAH (DECREE HOLDER) CLAIMED COMPENSATION, AND NO ACTION OF BMC AND SO HE MOVED EXECUTION OF DECREE,
5. RUDDRAIAH CLAIMED FALSELY THAT ?BMC OFFICIALS STOPPED HIM TO PUT UP COMPOUND WALL?,
6. BMC NEVER ATTEMPTED TO INTERFERE WITH POSSESSION OF DECREE HOLDER,
7. BMC NOT MADE ANY ATTEMPTTO INTERFERE IN ANY WAY.
8. BMC NEVER DISOBEYED COURT ORDER OF 9.12.1982,
9. BMC SHOULD BE DISCHARGED FROM BEING ?JUDGEMENT DEBTOR?, ETC?
11. THE COURT DOES NOT ACCEPT THE JuD? ? BMC?s STAND.
12. Dhr MADE OUT THE GROUNDS THAT JuD IS NOT JUST TO REQUEST TO RECALL SHOW CAUSE NOTICE OF COURT.
13. Dhr HELD THE JuD ? BMC DISOBEYED COURT ORDER OF 9,12.1982 ? ?DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION? GRANTED IN RA/559/1977,
14. JuD ? BMC FILED A MEMO ON 18,2,99 BY DUE VERIFICATION IN EXE.1019/1997, THAT,
1. ITS ASST ENGINER , MALLESHWARAM, S.P SUBMITTED THAT LAND MEASURING 16? X 60 FEET BELONGING TO DECREE HOLDER HAS BEEN UTILIZED FOR SEWERAGE PUEPOSE AND ALREADY SANITARY PIPE LINES IN THE SAID LAND AND KICCHA ROAD IS EXISTING ON THE LAND.
2. (RECOMMENDED COMPENSATION OR ALTERNATE LAND IS GIVEN TO Dhr.) IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE CIRCUMSTANCES JuD already utilized the sites of Dhr, the action will be taken for proposal for alternate land (site) or compensation.
3. JuD prayed the court be pleased to dismiss EXE. PETITION NO.1019/1997 ON 18/2.1999.
4. Dhr in his Memo Exe. On 23.10.1998 agreed for recall of Notice.
5. Exe. Court in its Order on 17.6.99, passed..
?Perused Memo filed by both Dhr and JuD. The E.P is cleared is subject to the grant of alternate site to Dhr
By JuD. It is made clear that Dhr is entitled to initiate fresh Execution proceedings in case the JuD do not provide alternate site within a reasonable time.??
Sd/- XXVII ADDNL.CIVIL COURT JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY.
15. JuD ? BMC PASSED A MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION NO.41(370) IN JANUARY 2000 READING AS UNDER TO CONVEY THAT IT WOULD PROVIDE ALTERNATE SITE AT MALLESHWARAM.
16. BUT JuD ? CONTINUED TO DILLY AND DALLY AND IT SAID THAT IT WOULD SEND FOR APPROVAL OF GOVERNMENT UNDER SEC. 98(3) OF KMC ACT, 1976.
17. GOVERNMENT DID NOT GRANT APPROVAL AT ALL AND DhR ? RUDDRAIAH MOVES A WRIT PETITION NO?41759/2002(LR-RES)??..FOR MANDAMUS, AT KARNATAKA HIGH COURT.
18. COURT ORDERS TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE SITE ?WITH IN Two weeks FROM THE DATE OF ORDER 28/6 2005??WITH LIBERTY TO FILE WRIT APPEAL IF ALTERNATE SITE NOT PROVIDED BY JuD ? BMC:
High Court Order reading as under:
?The State government is directed to take action as regards the Resolution of the Corporation to hand an alternate site to the petitioner in accordance with the undertaking-Annexure ?C? in any event with in a period of TWO WEEKS from today.
Copy of the Order may be made available to the respondents? (the commissioner of Bangalore Mahanagar Palike) and the Under secretary (UDD)Gvt of Karnataka)
19. GOVERNMENT PASSES again AN ORDER.
UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005 CANCELLING THE MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION DELIBERATELY AND VEXATIOUSLY, TO FRUSTRATE MANDAMUS ORDER OF HIGH COURT. This order is passed 12.8.2005, say about 2 weeks earlier to the Court Order, against the principle that the matter is already resting under the Writ filed in 2002 and hence no order can be passed when the matter is ?sub judice?. So the government acted arbitrarily again without any legal authority, just to counter and fail the High Court judgement
20. DhR FILES WRIT APPEAL NO.230630/2005 ON THE BASIS THAT GOVERNMENT CANCELLED MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION OF 2000 BY ITS ORDER: UDD/136/MNG/2005 DATED 12.8.2005 TO FRUSTRATE THE COURT ORDERS TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE SITES already agreed by an Affidavit with city civil court at Bangalore in 1999, vide the JuD Affidavit in the Exe Petition filed in OS/1019/1997. A clear violation of principals of natural justice and of Rule of Law. A clear case of contempt of court right from civil court and the High Court of Karnataka.
21. COURT PASSES AGAIN WRIT ORDERS DATED 30.8.2006 , IN THE Writ appeal 23063/2005(LB-RES) SETTING ASIDE THE GOVERNMENT ORDER UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005 AND DIRECTS THE GOVERNMENT, THAT THE GOVERNMENT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SETTING ASIDE ITS ORDER OF 12.8.2005, IT SHALL DO NATURAL JUSTICE, ORDER RUNS AS FOLLOWS:
22. THE GOVERNMENT AGAIN REVIVES ITS ORDER UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005, SINCE SET ASIDE BY THE HONORBLE HIGH COURT AND THUS DENIES ALTERNATE SITE WHICH HAD BEEN AGGREED IN MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION NO.41 (370)/2000 DATED?..JANUARY 2000, IN TOTAL DISRESPECT OF THE COURT?S ORDER OF 30.8.2006, IN ITS ORDER DATED 7.7.2007.
23. AGGRIEVED RUDDRAIAH- DhR SENDS AGAIN NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AND BMC TO RESTORE MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION OF 2000 TO PROVIDE HIM ALTERNATE SITE AT LOCATION, ALREADY ORDERED BY CITY CIVIL JUDGE IN 1999 AND AGAIN BY HIGH COURT ORDERS.
24. THE GOVERNMENT AGAIN PASSES ORDER ON 9.4.2008 REJECTING COURT ORDERS AND AGAIN CANCELS MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION 41(370) OF 2000 BY FURTHER RESTORING ITS UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005 IN UTTER DISREGARD TO HIGH COURT ORDERS dated 28.6.2005 and 30.8.2006. Again attempting a contempt of court orders.
25. THE GOVERNMENT COMMITS CONTEMPT OF COURTS BY DISRESPECTING ALL COURTS ORDERS.
26. FINALLY RUDDRAIAH SENDS FINAL NOTICE DATED 31.8.2009 TO GOVERNMENT, TO PROVIDE HIM ALTERNATE SITE AS FOUND IN MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION NO.41 (370) /2000 DATED JANUARY 2000, since revived by high court order dated 30.8.2006. FAILING WHICH HE WILL BE CONSTRAINED TO MOVE SUPREME COURT FOR EQUITY AND NATURAL JUSTICE UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF INDIAN CONSTTUTION.
27. IN THE MEAN TIME RUDDRAIAH APPEAL TO LOK ADALAT OF KARNATAKA. The matter is still pending with Lok Ayukta, due to a heavy back log of cases.
28. In the meantime C. Ruddraiah is advised to file another Writ Appeal as also Contempt proceedings against BBMC and Principal secretary(UDD) of government of Karnataka, in Karnataka High Court, with a liberty to file damages suit against government of Karnataka and BBMC.
MAIN POINTS DRAFT;
1. R PURCHASED SITES, 25 AND 26 AT BANGALORE FROM SMT LAKSHMAMMA IN 1997.
2. THIS LADY FILED A CIVIL CASE OS.3046/1977?.IN THE FIRST MUNSIFF CIVIL COURT AT BANGALORE FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST BANGALORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AS BMC WANTED ATTEMPTED TO FORM A ROAD AND OPEN SEWERAGE DRAIN ON PROPERTY AT SITE NOS.25 AND 26 WHICH PROPERTY IS OWNED BY HER AS ABSOLUTE OWNER.
3. THE MUNSIFF COURT DISMISSED HER SUIT OS3046/1977 ON 25.6.1979.
4. AGGRIEVED, SHE MOVES APPEAL UNDER RA/599/1980 BEFORE CITY CIVIL JUDGE BANGALORE. COURT ALLOWS HER APPEAL AND PASSED DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON 9.12.1982.
5. INJUNCTION AGAINST BMC IS IN THE FORM OF A DECREE FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
6. RUDRAIAH, THE NEW OWNER OF HER ABSOLUTE OWNERSHIP PROPERTIES AT SITES 25 AND 26, SINCE PURCHASED UNDER A SALE DEED DULY REGISTERED ON 29.1.1993, ON THE BASIS THAT SHE OBTAINED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST ?BMC?, IN HER RA/599/1980 AND GRANTED INJUNCTION ON 9.12.1982.
7. RUDDRAIAH AS SUCCESSOR TO THE PROPERTY HAS TO MOVE EXECUTION OF DECREE, IN 1997 AGAINST ?BMC? AS IT AGAIN OBSTRUCTED HIM FROM MOVING HIS BUILDING MATERIALS TO THE SITES 25 AND 26 BY ITS OFFICERS AND WORKERS.
8. RUDDRAIAH MOVES EXECUTION PETITION NO.1019/1997 AGAINST IN THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE COURT ON 20.9.1997, WITH DUE AFFIDAVITS TO PROTECT HIS PROPERTY AS NEW OWNER SINCE 29.1.1993.
9. THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE TREATS ?BMC? AS ?JuD?, ENFORCES THE DECREE.
10. BMC MOVES APPLICATION U/S.151 OF CPC, RAISING ALL FRIVOLOUS REASONS, and asking the court to prepone THE CASE 5.11.1998 TO 23.10.98, BY FILING AN AFFIDAVIT DATED 16.10.1998 FOR ?EQUITY? UNDER ITS OBJECTIONS:
1. EXE. PETTITION OF RUDDRAIAH 10/19/1997 AS NOT MAINTAINABLE,
2. EXECUTOR AS THE THIRD PERSON,
3. LAKSHMAMMA, ORIGINAL DECREE HOLDER DID NOT RAISE OBJECTION TO JuD (BMC) FOR LAST 20 YEARS..,
4. RUDDRAIAH (DECREE HOLDER) CLAIMED COMPENSATION, AND NO ACTION OF BMC AND SO HE MOVED EXECUTION OF DECREE,
5. RUDDRAIAH CLAIMED FALSELY THAT ?BMC OFFICIALS STOPPED HIM TO PUT UP COMPOUND WALL?,
6. BMC NEVER ATTEMPTED TO INTERFERE WITH POSSESSION OF DECREE HOLDER,
7. BMC NOT MADE ANY ATTEMPTTO INTERFERE IN ANY WAY.
8. BMC NEVER DISOBEYED COURT ORDER OF 9.12.1982,
9. BMC SHOULD BE DISCHARGED FROM BEING ?JUDGEMENT DEBTOR?, ETC?
11. THE COURT DOES NOT ACCEPT THE JuD? ? BMC?s STAND.
12. Dhr MADE OUT THE GROUNDS THAT JuD IS NOT JUST TO REQUEST TO RECALL SHOW CAUSE NOTICE OF COURT.
13. Dhr HELD THE JuD ? BMC DISOBEYED COURT ORDER OF 9,12.1982 ? ?DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION? GRANTED IN RA/559/1977,
14. JuD ? BMC FILED A MEMO ON 18,2,99 BY DUE VERIFICATION IN EXE.1019/1997, THAT,
1. ITS ASST ENGINER , MALLESHWARAM, S.P SUBMITTED THAT LAND MEASURING 16? X 60 FEET BELONGING TO DECREE HOLDER HAS BEEN UTILIZED FOR SEWERAGE PUEPOSE AND ALREADY SANITARY PIPE LINES IN THE SAID LAND AND KICCHA ROAD IS EXISTING ON THE LAND.
2. (RECOMMENDED COMPENSATION OR ALTERNATE LAND IS GIVEN TO Dhr.) IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE CIRCUMSTANCES JuD already utilized the sites of Dhr, the action will be taken for proposal for alternate land (site) or compensation.
3. JuD prayed the court be pleased to dismiss EXE. PETITION NO.1019/1997 ON 18/2.1999.
4. Dhr in his Memo Exe. On 23.10.1998 agreed for recall of Notice.
5. Exe. Court in its Order on 17.6.99, passed..
?Perused Memo filed by both Dhr and JuD. The E.P is cleared is subject to the grant of alternate site to Dhr
By JuD. It is made clear that Dhr is entitled to initiate fresh Execution proceedings in case the JuD do not provide alternate site within a reasonable time.??
Sd/- XXVII ADDNL.CIVIL COURT JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY.
15. JuD ? BMC PASSED A MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION NO.41(370) IN JANUARY 2000 READING AS UNDER TO CONVEY THAT IT WOULD PROVIDE ALTERNATE SITE AT MALLESHWARAM.
16. BUT JuD ? CONTINUED TO DILLY AND DALLY AND IT SAID THAT IT WOULD SEND FOR APPROVAL OF GOVERNMENT UNDER SEC. 98(3) OF KMC ACT, 1976.
17. GOVERNMENT DID NOT GRANT APPROVAL AT ALL AND DhR ? RUDDRAIAH MOVES A WRIT PETITION NO?41759/2002(LR-RES)??..FOR MANDAMUS, AT KARNATAKA HIGH COURT.
18. COURT ORDERS TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE SITE ?WITH IN Two weeks FROM THE DATE OF ORDER 28/6 2005??WITH LIBERTY TO FILE WRIT APPEAL IF ALTERNATE SITE NOT PROVIDED BY JuD ? BMC:
High Court Order reading as under:
?The State government is directed to take action as regards the Resolution of the Corporation to hand an alternate site to the petitioner in accordance with the undertaking-Annexure ?C? in any event with in a period of TWO WEEKS from today.
Copy of the Order may be made available to the respondents? (the commissioner of Bangalore Mahanagar Palike) and the Under secretary (UDD)Gvt of Karnataka)
19. GOVERNMENT PASSES again AN ORDER.
UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005 CANCELLING THE MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION DELIBERATELY AND VEXATIOUSLY, TO FRUSTRATE MANDAMUS ORDER OF HIGH COURT. This order is passed 12.8.2005, say about 2 weeks earlier to the Court Order, against the principle that the matter is already resting under the Writ filed in 2002 and hence no order can be passed when the matter is ?sub judice?. So the government acted arbitrarily again without any legal authority, just to counter and fail the High Court judgement
20. DhR FILES WRIT APPEAL NO.230630/2005 ON THE BASIS THAT GOVERNMENT CANCELLED MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION OF 2000 BY ITS ORDER: UDD/136/MNG/2005 DATED 12.8.2005 TO FRUSTRATE THE COURT ORDERS TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE SITES already agreed by an Affidavit with city civil court at Bangalore in 1999, vide the JuD Affidavit in the Exe Petition filed in OS/1019/1997. A clear violation of principals of natural justice and of Rule of Law. A clear case of contempt of court right from civil court and the High Court of Karnataka.
21. COURT PASSES AGAIN WRIT ORDERS DATED 30.8.2006 , IN THE Writ appeal 23063/2005(LB-RES) SETTING ASIDE THE GOVERNMENT ORDER UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005 AND DIRECTS THE GOVERNMENT, THAT THE GOVERNMENT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SETTING ASIDE ITS ORDER OF 12.8.2005, IT SHALL DO NATURAL JUSTICE, ORDER RUNS AS FOLLOWS:
22. THE GOVERNMENT AGAIN REVIVES ITS ORDER UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005, SINCE SET ASIDE BY THE HONORBLE HIGH COURT AND THUS DENIES ALTERNATE SITE WHICH HAD BEEN AGGREED IN MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION NO.41 (370)/2000 DATED?..JANUARY 2000, IN TOTAL DISRESPECT OF THE COURT?S ORDER OF 30.8.2006, IN ITS ORDER DATED 7.7.2007.
23. AGGRIEVED RUDDRAIAH- DhR SENDS AGAIN NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AND BMC TO RESTORE MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION OF 2000 TO PROVIDE HIM ALTERNATE SITE AT LOCATION, ALREADY ORDERED BY CITY CIVIL JUDGE IN 1999 AND AGAIN BY HIGH COURT ORDERS.
24. THE GOVERNMENT AGAIN PASSES ORDER ON 9.4.2008 REJECTING COURT ORDERS AND AGAIN CANCELS MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION 41(370) OF 2000 BY FURTHER RESTORING ITS UDD/136/MNG/2004 DATED 12.8.2005 IN UTTER DISREGARD TO HIGH COURT ORDERS dated 28.6.2005 and 30.8.2006. Again attempting a contempt of court orders.
25. THE GOVERNMENT COMMITS CONTEMPT OF COURTS BY DISRESPECTING ALL COURTS ORDERS.
26. FINALLY RUDDRAIAH SENDS FINAL NOTICE DATED 31.8.2009 TO GOVERNMENT, TO PROVIDE HIM ALTERNATE SITE AS FOUND IN MUNICIPAL RESOLUTION NO.41 (370) /2000 DATED JANUARY 2000, since revived by high court order dated 30.8.2006. FAILING WHICH HE WILL BE CONSTRAINED TO MOVE SUPREME COURT FOR EQUITY AND NATURAL JUSTICE UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF INDIAN CONSTTUTION.
27. IN THE MEAN TIME RUDDRAIAH APPEAL TO LOK ADALAT OF KARNATAKA. The matter is still pending with Lok Ayukta, due to a heavy back log of cases.
28. In the meantime C. Ruddraiah is advised to file another Writ Appeal as also Contempt proceedings against BBMC and Principal secretary(UDD) of government of Karnataka, in Karnataka High Court, with a liberty to file damages suit against government of Karnataka and BBMC.
Friday, February 5, 2010
union of india is industructible
In Shamsheer Singh v/s. Union of India, (1975)ISCR814; AIR 1974 SC 2192: Judgement quoted Dr.Br.BR Ambedkar stated on the floor of Constituent Assembly:'that the constitution of India is both unitary as well as Federal according to the requirements of time and circumstances. The Union of India is indestructible and democratic government and federal functional mechanism are the basic features(referred again in SR Bommai,1994(3) SCC = AIR 1994 SC 1918.
Friday, January 29, 2010
emerging trends..!
Emerging trends in education sector in 21st century in the second decade
- Education in human recourses development special needs:
Education means drawing knowledge of experiences of people lived before. It is not some thing very abstract. In Education nothing is abstract but just real facts how people visualized at that particular time.
One could have learned about James Watson of 150 years back. He is the founder of Indian Income Tax Act of 1860. He was just a hat maker of Scotland, as father wanted him to get into real business instead of hypothetical education of that time. Real business will teach you real learning. So he accepted his father?s advice and he really did real learning. That helped him really carve out Indian stabilized income tax system in a matter of 9 months he was in India, and he died of dysentery in 1859 creating a frame work for Indian Income tax system.
Yes he was in Britain in Revenue ministry otherwise known as finance ministry. He presented first Indian Budget in 1859. Yes he was working with Trevelyan, a former governor of Madras, as he believed ?No Taxation without Representation? concept of Americans. His tomb can be found in Calcutta (modern Kolkata of West Bengal).
Hall mark of education is Experience. So we fall back on history of events that is the basic of experience.
Education draws back on the already obtained information that is experiential learning.
That is the foundation of all learning in education. Without that you have no education as such at all. Be it science or technology or for that matter any education.
This student as also the teacher has to appreciate every where in all schools or colleges or universities, anywhere in the world. No country can be run without historical determination, so called by Late Dr. S Radhakrishnan, our Ex Second President of India. Education is the key to development if it is true application of mind, not just academic of abstract discussions like philosophy, even in philosophy we relate experiences of the past and then discuss.
This is the developmental mechanism of human resources any where in the world. This aspect has to be understood by teachers while teaching students in every school. Schools are primary disciplining rooms for pupils. After about 10+2+3 of this discipline they move to +2(say Pg courses)
Human Approach to get best of the skills in human resource by high element of motivation;
Learning history of peoples is indeed a difficult task, unless one is motivated. In schools teachers hold recitation competitions among pupils just to motivate them to memorize the texts so that the information becomes stored in the pupils. After several years that material becomes a second nature in them to recall the recited passages. This is by several years of practice tips.
Similarly different subjects are committed to memory over years of practice. This takes about 15 years are so up to an undergraduate level, similarly it takes 10 full years of school education for the pupil. So they suggested a group behaviorist technique for pupils. If so many pupils repeat naturally motivates the pupils to recite without faltering in the basic knowledge building without application of that knowledge.
But once the pupils go o graduation programs they are told to apply over period of +2+2 in general education and in technical and in medical education +4+2. This application is motivated by application skills built in the pupils/students. This is real development of individuals to properly apply skills in the relevant fields, so that the knowledge built in helps the student to guide and help other in real life situations.
Enhance humility in every manager to be to realize alone he will not be able to do anything;
Humility only helps one to learn. Without humility you will learn nothing. So teachers also are humble in their behavior and that percolates in the students due to several years of practice. Thus human is built in man. This will mean Humility + Man=Human. So man with humility is different from animalistic world. Animalistic means Animal-(highly animated/aggressive) to become animalistic in behavior (full of aggressive behavior without reasoning and logic) Humility already devoid of aggressive behavior in man. This quality only helps the human being to behave in a most decent manner with other persons to elicit again humility in the other. This leads to peaceful and logical and meaningful living. This cult has to be developed in every manager to be, by proper education which Gurukuls did in the past by calling a person as proper Adult meaning one can adulate the person meaning thereby that person is loveable and every one would like to learn the art of living. Manager should ensure that every one working with him loves him for his humanistic qualities. This has to be developed in every one by teachers.
- Synchronize the resource of many human resources get motivated in a given setting;
- the human Acclimatize resource at least to three or four settings of different humans ;
- Money should not be driving force in the resource but passion for Excellence in the allocated functions with fixation of mind the new resource penetrating to realize it is to work with another man and certainly not machine or robots;
- Accentuate the self actualization in every interacting human resource;
- Synchronize the needs with human resource already existing;
- Education sector task to work for appropriate motivation- an engine to perfect the resource to meet the challenges posed by consumers;
- Sequence the power of man to meet challenges to minimize conflicts among resources and develop respect between man and man in real work environment by class rooms group psychology;
- All raging should become minimum or negligible to build confidence in group;
- Sequence over periods of time in class as also in work environs;
- Sequence in such a way to optimize production of factors but should be congenial to customer lest he is lost in the melee;
- Develop humility in every foreman/manager to be lively to work with;
- Minimize conflict zones between human resources to automatically mesh with leading to passion for excellence in the tasks assigned, as knowledge alone cannot help;
- Create the importance in the resource to highly appreciate division of work as every work is the spoke in the wheel;
- Teachers/faculties face these challenges every where in education sector;
- If teachers fail economies will suffer, so that build the importance ethical behavior ? never try to fool others as the price is very high.
The above are some components of 21st century.
- Education in human recourses development special needs:
Education means drawing knowledge of experiences of people lived before. It is not some thing very abstract. In Education nothing is abstract but just real facts how people visualized at that particular time.
One could have learned about James Watson of 150 years back. He is the founder of Indian Income Tax Act of 1860. He was just a hat maker of Scotland, as father wanted him to get into real business instead of hypothetical education of that time. Real business will teach you real learning. So he accepted his father?s advice and he really did real learning. That helped him really carve out Indian stabilized income tax system in a matter of 9 months he was in India, and he died of dysentery in 1859 creating a frame work for Indian Income tax system.
Yes he was in Britain in Revenue ministry otherwise known as finance ministry. He presented first Indian Budget in 1859. Yes he was working with Trevelyan, a former governor of Madras, as he believed ?No Taxation without Representation? concept of Americans. His tomb can be found in Calcutta (modern Kolkata of West Bengal).
Hall mark of education is Experience. So we fall back on history of events that is the basic of experience.
Education draws back on the already obtained information that is experiential learning.
That is the foundation of all learning in education. Without that you have no education as such at all. Be it science or technology or for that matter any education.
This student as also the teacher has to appreciate every where in all schools or colleges or universities, anywhere in the world. No country can be run without historical determination, so called by Late Dr. S Radhakrishnan, our Ex Second President of India. Education is the key to development if it is true application of mind, not just academic of abstract discussions like philosophy, even in philosophy we relate experiences of the past and then discuss.
This is the developmental mechanism of human resources any where in the world. This aspect has to be understood by teachers while teaching students in every school. Schools are primary disciplining rooms for pupils. After about 10+2+3 of this discipline they move to +2(say Pg courses)
Human Approach to get best of the skills in human resource by high element of motivation;
Learning history of peoples is indeed a difficult task, unless one is motivated. In schools teachers hold recitation competitions among pupils just to motivate them to memorize the texts so that the information becomes stored in the pupils. After several years that material becomes a second nature in them to recall the recited passages. This is by several years of practice tips.
Similarly different subjects are committed to memory over years of practice. This takes about 15 years are so up to an undergraduate level, similarly it takes 10 full years of school education for the pupil. So they suggested a group behaviorist technique for pupils. If so many pupils repeat naturally motivates the pupils to recite without faltering in the basic knowledge building without application of that knowledge.
But once the pupils go o graduation programs they are told to apply over period of +2+2 in general education and in technical and in medical education +4+2. This application is motivated by application skills built in the pupils/students. This is real development of individuals to properly apply skills in the relevant fields, so that the knowledge built in helps the student to guide and help other in real life situations.
Enhance humility in every manager to be to realize alone he will not be able to do anything;
Humility only helps one to learn. Without humility you will learn nothing. So teachers also are humble in their behavior and that percolates in the students due to several years of practice. Thus human is built in man. This will mean Humility + Man=Human. So man with humility is different from animalistic world. Animalistic means Animal-(highly animated/aggressive) to become animalistic in behavior (full of aggressive behavior without reasoning and logic) Humility already devoid of aggressive behavior in man. This quality only helps the human being to behave in a most decent manner with other persons to elicit again humility in the other. This leads to peaceful and logical and meaningful living. This cult has to be developed in every manager to be, by proper education which Gurukuls did in the past by calling a person as proper Adult meaning one can adulate the person meaning thereby that person is loveable and every one would like to learn the art of living. Manager should ensure that every one working with him loves him for his humanistic qualities. This has to be developed in every one by teachers.
- Synchronize the resource of many human resources get motivated in a given setting;
- the human Acclimatize resource at least to three or four settings of different humans ;
- Money should not be driving force in the resource but passion for Excellence in the allocated functions with fixation of mind the new resource penetrating to realize it is to work with another man and certainly not machine or robots;
- Accentuate the self actualization in every interacting human resource;
- Synchronize the needs with human resource already existing;
- Education sector task to work for appropriate motivation- an engine to perfect the resource to meet the challenges posed by consumers;
- Sequence the power of man to meet challenges to minimize conflicts among resources and develop respect between man and man in real work environment by class rooms group psychology;
- All raging should become minimum or negligible to build confidence in group;
- Sequence over periods of time in class as also in work environs;
- Sequence in such a way to optimize production of factors but should be congenial to customer lest he is lost in the melee;
- Develop humility in every foreman/manager to be lively to work with;
- Minimize conflict zones between human resources to automatically mesh with leading to passion for excellence in the tasks assigned, as knowledge alone cannot help;
- Create the importance in the resource to highly appreciate division of work as every work is the spoke in the wheel;
- Teachers/faculties face these challenges every where in education sector;
- If teachers fail economies will suffer, so that build the importance ethical behavior ? never try to fool others as the price is very high.
The above are some components of 21st century.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
ET AWARDS!
WHAT NEWDECADE FROM 2010 NEEDS & PROMISSES?
400 CEOs IN ?ET? AWARDS FESTIVAL 2008-09 LEARNT!
DR. G.BALAKRISHNAN, PhD
A gala awards function of Economic times in Hotel Trident at Mumbai. A Global CEO Consultant Ram Charan landed at Trident from New York. Said, ?create a 12 month agenda (while you may change the sequence but select the items that you want to spend more time on!); - Boards have a lot of power point presentations that throw a ?lot of data? at Directors(of companies). Instead have a 5 minute presentation on main points to be discussed and what is the bad news. Boards need to spend a lot of time on ?dialogue? because that will benefit the company most. Board members need to be individually evaluated. There are 3 questions to be asked to every member of the board ? what are the ?three things? in your mind that the board had done well? What are the ?three things? in your mind that the board should do next year, to be more effective? What is the output you aspire for??
He said while selecting a CEO, the board should ?look at the person whether he has continually increased his or her sphere of work and the band width? Can he handle complexity; can he sort out, sift out, and select properly what the key issues are, because at CEO level that is what is really important. Secondly, he has to be a ?profit & loss? manger. He should know how to make money i.e. able to convert every opportunity to money. Thirdly, ?can he build external and internal relationships?; and fourthly, ?Can he select right people (for right jobs)?.
Ramakrishnan of Bajaj Electricals wanted ?recipe? for a CEO?s failure, he said, ?Each individual has his god?s gift ? uniqueness- and the biggest failure happens at the time of CEO selections (rests with Board), since a CEO to a job is a ?critical input ? and in most failures that is the ?Key Reason?.
On Role of Promoter- CEO, mostly in FAMILY-LED-ENTERPRISES if he wants to scale up from middle to large scale, Charan said, ?to use his teams as ?multipliers? as he has only 24 hours at his disposal every day and that is what keep on multiplying the ?future of business???
Summing up his views, said, ?If you are a global company and you want use the Board effectively, Be Sure you have MORE members who can dissect the balance sheet. ?Adding further, ?Many Boards had run out of ?flexibility? and ?nobody? in Boards understands ?the entire systemic part of businesses?. For Global play, if a company wants to raise global capital , it needs global boards, global ?bench marks? and inclusion of board members understanding ?how the global financial system works? and on ? boards power? he said ? boards need to spend a lot of time on ?dialogue? because it will benefit the company the most?. Then he packed his bags to Vienna flight to catch up a Board meeting in Vienna. (Ends)
400 CEOs IN ?ET? AWARDS FESTIVAL 2008-09 LEARNT!
DR. G.BALAKRISHNAN, PhD
A gala awards function of Economic times in Hotel Trident at Mumbai. A Global CEO Consultant Ram Charan landed at Trident from New York. Said, ?create a 12 month agenda (while you may change the sequence but select the items that you want to spend more time on!); - Boards have a lot of power point presentations that throw a ?lot of data? at Directors(of companies). Instead have a 5 minute presentation on main points to be discussed and what is the bad news. Boards need to spend a lot of time on ?dialogue? because that will benefit the company most. Board members need to be individually evaluated. There are 3 questions to be asked to every member of the board ? what are the ?three things? in your mind that the board had done well? What are the ?three things? in your mind that the board should do next year, to be more effective? What is the output you aspire for??
He said while selecting a CEO, the board should ?look at the person whether he has continually increased his or her sphere of work and the band width? Can he handle complexity; can he sort out, sift out, and select properly what the key issues are, because at CEO level that is what is really important. Secondly, he has to be a ?profit & loss? manger. He should know how to make money i.e. able to convert every opportunity to money. Thirdly, ?can he build external and internal relationships?; and fourthly, ?Can he select right people (for right jobs)?.
Ramakrishnan of Bajaj Electricals wanted ?recipe? for a CEO?s failure, he said, ?Each individual has his god?s gift ? uniqueness- and the biggest failure happens at the time of CEO selections (rests with Board), since a CEO to a job is a ?critical input ? and in most failures that is the ?Key Reason?.
On Role of Promoter- CEO, mostly in FAMILY-LED-ENTERPRISES if he wants to scale up from middle to large scale, Charan said, ?to use his teams as ?multipliers? as he has only 24 hours at his disposal every day and that is what keep on multiplying the ?future of business???
Summing up his views, said, ?If you are a global company and you want use the Board effectively, Be Sure you have MORE members who can dissect the balance sheet. ?Adding further, ?Many Boards had run out of ?flexibility? and ?nobody? in Boards understands ?the entire systemic part of businesses?. For Global play, if a company wants to raise global capital , it needs global boards, global ?bench marks? and inclusion of board members understanding ?how the global financial system works? and on ? boards power? he said ? boards need to spend a lot of time on ?dialogue? because it will benefit the company the most?. Then he packed his bags to Vienna flight to catch up a Board meeting in Vienna. (Ends)
Friday, January 8, 2010
Why Knee Jerk Mr. Lawyer, at union Home Minister P. Chidambaram?s circular to all States to file all complaints at police stations should be made into FIRs, after all police officer is not an adjudicating officer!
After all Police officer is an Executive of State to implement law enforcement, as a public servant and not a Judge please!!
By G. Balakrishnan, PhD (Economics Legislations)
(Bombay High Court Mediator, a Counsel at Supreme Court of India)
Let us see Cr. P C 154,156, 157,173,190and IPC sections 182,211.
U/s.190 IPC- Cognizance of offences by Magistrates ? (2) Chief Judicial Magistrate empowers Magistrates of Second class to ?take cognizance under sub.sec(1)?Subject to provisions of Ch XIV, any Magistrate of First class, and any Second Class specially empowered in this behalf u/s/s(2) may take cognizance of any offence:
(a) Upon receiving a complaint which constitute such offence :
(b) Upon a police report on such ?facts?;
(c) Upon information received from any person other than police officer, or upon his own knowledge, that such offence has been committed.
(Union territory of Chandigarh Amendment ? 190A?Cognizance of offences by Executive Magistrate ?
?Cognizance of any specific offence ??vide Punjab Act 22 of 1983(w.e.f 27.6.1983)
Note 1: No of ?false cases? will in fact arise though some lawyers like Mr. Majeed Memon, or Human Rights Activists like Dr. Avisha Kulkarni may feel so? ( as reported in TOI dated 30.12.2009). In fact the provisions are already in place ??any body files ?false case? will get punished under same law. So Mr. P Chidambaram, an eminent Supreme Court lawyer himself is not wrong in issuing the circular to all State Governments to ensure all police stations should accept cognizable complaints as FIR, even if claimed so by a complainant, after all police man, before arresting a person will have to investigate himself and if he finds it is false he can go the magistrate to issue arrest warrant against such a person, on the basis of police report, yes may be a little more work to be performed by police but he cannot avoid by becoming an illegal adjudicator as to decide whether to admit a complaint as FIR or not? That is the job of Magistrate after all Magistrate courts are there in the most places.
So I do not find that kind of knee jerk is not needed at all, when the law is already in place there. One important thing is to be noted is policeman or the State concerned wants to avoid State police?s sacred duty to the citizens.
About 68.67 lakh persons were arrested in 2007. There are about 1.5 crores trials show there are wrong kinds or manipulated FIRs, and delays definitely would be likely on account of indecent kind of adjournments available for many lawyers for asking though law prohibits irrational and delay tactic based adjournments in most of Magistrates and Sessions Courts and some in High Courts for there are confusing kinds of Affidavits filed making the delivery system chocking. Now High courts are trying to use moderating technique of Mediators are being appointed so that fixed kind of commitments as overheads are avoided.
Adhit Shirodkar?s view Home Minister?s circular can?t be implemented without amending the law statute. Another view advanced is an FIR for every complaint would nullify between cognizable and non cognizable offences, after all, this Ld. advocate also should know police officer is not an adjudicator like a judge or if he is why there is a need of Magistrates at all. It is to be remembered the police officer is an executive of government just to implement laws, as a public servant. How a servant of citizens can become an adjudicator. It is an irony English is not properly understood perhaps! There is a difference between ?Master and Servant?.
Citizen is a Master and public servant is a servant of citizen. Legislators are just representatives of citizens functioning in a representative capacity. So Legislators though trying to keep themselves out of public servant definition but the person who draws their salaries and remuneration automatically become public servants is the principle of public servant.
Public prosecutor is not a public servant as he is not drawing his remuneration from tax payer directly, but the public servant is not able to really function without to help of public prosecutor, though he is expected to do the function. His inability is substituted by a mechanism of appointing an advocate as public prosecutor, after all no Advocate member of a Bar Council can become an employee but the Advocate is a power of Attorney holder by means of a ?Vakkalat Nama? of a public servant or state. If an Advocate chooses to become a servant naturally he should surrender his License called ?Sannad? to Bar Council.
In another case law S.D. Soni v/s. St. of Gujarat (1991) Cr. L J 330(SC), ?The Magistrate has no power to take cognizance of an offence on the basis of private complaint that resulted in submission of report u/s 173(Report of Police officer on completion of investigation). Consequent upon reference made under s. 156(3) ?any magistrate empowered u/s190 (cognizance of upon offences by Magistrate) when once he has accepted the police officer report has to close the proceedings).
This is when read it amounts to a fact that it is not mandatory on Magistrate to accept the police officer?s report as a basis for his judgment, it is clear that till Magistrate accepts, is the rider, the Police officer?s report, it is subject to variance by the magistrate.
S.182 ?IPC ? ?false information, with intent to cause a public servant to use his lawful powers to the injury of another person?shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for terms which may extend to 6 months or with fine which may extend to Rs.1000/- or both(substituted by Act 3 of 1895, Sec 1 for the Original section).
Sec.211-IPC ? ?false charge of offence made with intent to injure?if such, criminal procedure be instituted on a ?false charge? of an offense punishable with death (substituted Act 26 of 1955, sec 117 and Schedule for ?Transportation of life? w e f 1.1.1956) or imprisonment for seven years or upwards, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years and shall be liable to fine?.
Sec.154 ? CPC, information in cognizable offence (2) ?A copy of information as recorded under sec 1 shall be given, free of cost, to the informant (3). Any person aggrieved by refusal on the part of officer in charge of police station to record information referred to s/s(1) may send the substance of information in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who if failed that such information discloses the commission of offense shall either investigate the case himself, or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by the code and such officer shall have all powers of an officer in charge of police station in relation to the offense .(case law: Manoj v/s. St. of MP (1999(2) Crimes SCC 715: AIR 1999 SC 1403): 1999(3) Crimes329(SC) ? ?FIR requires to contain basic prosecution case?.
Another case law: ?two sheets of Station House diary torn off and another sheet is pasted. Case registered on the version given by accused to Police Sub-Inspector. ?Credence cannot be given to police version that case registered as F I R. (St. Of Kar v/s. K. Yerrappa Reddy, 1999(4) Crimes 171(SC).
Note: This difference is to be activated and Union Home Minister?s circular is already in conformity with existing sections. So there is no power with police officer to adjudicate, as adjudicator is only the Magistrate only. (Ends)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)