contd..

Even Indian Law Institute published a volume but that work is doubtful on the legal research presence in law as such.

Today we find several conflicting opinions, lie Law department advices the other ministries that law courts should not step in eminent domain, like Veerappa Moily recently gave a clean chit to Telecom ministry to ignore the Regulator though that ministry deliberately permitted several thousands crores losses to exchequer as the telecom minstry choose to help the earlier bidders in telecom in G2 spectrum.

So the state is fluid to accept all corruptions at the cost of tax payers of all sorts.. direct or indirect tax payers not only in India, but world over!

Is it not high time that legal coommunity should be accountable?

In the conference how they will tackle is a 100 bn $ question. After all people are day by day lose confidence in law courts and they desist to come to courts as they are not confident whether courts are for them or for arbitrary legislators!

Before things go out of hand, is it not the duty of Law authorities, academics, jurists world over to ponder over to rectify?

Some say legal research, is there any legal researches commissioned by governments any where inthe world as is done in social research methods. Even today, we giver LL.D, or PhD degrees in law with really no sensible research!

Every statute is countered by by some other statute, by legislators, half knowledge specimen on earth. they escape by eminent domain to do every other arbitrary thing!

Law research is not like other known research areas like physics, chemistry, economics, sociology. So Law is indeed groping in dark by conflicting decisions and create more and more conflicts in societies..

contd..

Braden was the first

contd..

President Woodrow Wilson said, 'I do not see any one can possibly understand the law or know anything of it, except ;Memoriter' without getting a clear idea of how it iis in fact generated in society from age to age to its immediate needs and use'..indeed a thought to be pondered over by all eminent jurists, universities of law or schools of Law!

contg.

Braden member of Connecticut Bar in 1952 said in his article 'Legal Research : A variation of an old Lament' published in Journal of Legal Education 39-45(1952-53).

Clearly specified ' Legal Scholars write and write in the Law journals and publish and publish and what we do have.'...a lot of chaff with no grains!

Legal & Judicial [profession - High quality paper likely to be tackled in CWLC - Commonwealth Law conference in 2011 in February to be held at Hyderabad, india!

This is a 17th conference after a gap of 40 years. May attract legal minds all over from commonwealth.

Yes hosted by Commonwealth Lawyers association.

Time has come for soul searching. Whether Law is at all research based perspectives? Now so far the answer is clear No. It is a profession made of unrealistic laws as these laws are created by Legislators, as Laymen and Courts under great eminent domain accepts the so called statutes not standing on four legs but dangling on one leg like an acrobat.

leave RBI to really function as regulator pls!

regulator like RBI should not be managed by union cabinet - say finance ministry, as cabinet does not have as much expertise like RBI!

economy uncertain

uncertainties are very heavily dangling all people, as bankers and corporate houses so too governments play too much with economies' tax payers moneys with so called derivatives and hedges, u know the fate!

life & economics!

life is great if it do not give too much credence to destructible money!

live a life assacredly as you can then there is bliss and that is enlightenment

JOHN MACKEY ; 'I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT MAXIMIZING PROFITS FOR INVESTORS IS THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL CORPORATE ACTIONS. THE INVESTORS ARE NOT ONLY PEOPLE WHO MATTER . CORPORATIONS CAN EXIST FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN SIMPLY MAXIMIZING PROFITS.'

IT IS A GREAT STATEMENT EVERY CORPORATE HAS TO UNDERSTAND, TO WORK COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE WITH CUSTOMERS!